Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Eli Lilly and Company v. Apotex, Inc., No. 20-1328 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 21, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1328
Decided
December 21, 2020
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Apotex, Inc. appeals from the judgment of the district court in a patent -infringement suit brought by Eli Lilly & Company under the Hatch -Waxman Act, 21 U.S.C. § 355. T he district court granted Lilly ’s motion for sum- mary judgment of infringement, h olding that prosecution history estoppel does not bar Lilly from asserting infringe- ment of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,772,209 under the doctrine of equivalents. Because we discern no error in the district court’s decision, we affirm.