Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Via Vadis, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc., No. 19-2269 (Fed. Cir. July 8, 2020)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2269
Also Docketed
No. 19-2270 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
July 8, 2020
Judge
Chen, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Via Vadis, LLC and AC Technologies S.A. (collectively, Via Vadis) appeals a decision of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas finding the claim term “pre- specified parameters” in U.S. Patent No. RE40,521 (’521 patent) indefinite, thereby rendering the asserted claims invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2. 1 For the reasons that follow, we affirm-in-part and reverse-in-part. 1 Paragraph 2 of 35 U.S.C. § 112 was replaced by § 112(b) when the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), Pub. L. No. 112–29, 125 Stat.