Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Akeva L.L.C. v. Nike, Inc., No. 19-2249 (Fed. Cir. July 16, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2249
Decided
July 16, 2020
Judge
Chen, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Akeva L.L.C. (Akeva) owns a portfolio of footwear pa- tents including U.S. Patent Nos. 5,560,126 (’126 patent); 6,966,130 (’130 patent); 7,114,269 (’269 patent); 5380,350 (’350 patent); and 7,540,099 (’099 patent); (collectively, the Asserted Patents). The ’130, ’269, ’350, and ’099 patents all claim priority to the ’126 patent and are referred to as the Continuation Patents. Asics filed for declaratory judg- ment that it does not infringe the Asserted Patents and, in response, Akeva countersued for patent infringement.