Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Emed Technologies Corporation v. Repro-Med Systems, Inc., No. 19-2145 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2145
Decided
April 9, 2020
Judge
Chen, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff EMED Technologies Corporation (EMED) sued Repro- Med Systems, Inc. (Repro -Med) for infringe- ment of U.S. Patent No. 8,961,476 (the ’476 patent) . Fol- lowing claim construction, the district court granted Repro- Med’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement. EMED appeals the noninfringement ruling. We affirm. BACKGROUND I. The ’476 Patent The ’476 patent describes medical needle devices with built-in safety structures “to protect a user from the sharp tip of the medical needle.” ’476 patent at A bstract.