Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 19-2015 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2020)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2015
Also Docketed
No. 19-2387 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
August 28, 2020
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
26 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Egenera, Inc . (“Egenera”) sued Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts , alleging that Cisco’s enterprise server systems infringe various claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,231,430 (“the ’430 patent”). Prior to claim construction , and alongside an ongoing inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding, Egenera separately petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) to remove one of the eleven listed inventors from the ’430 patent.