Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Hvlpo2, LLC v. Oxygen Frog, LLC, No. 19-1649 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 5, 2020)

Reversed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1649
Decided
February 5, 2020
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

HVLPO2, LLC (HVO) sued Oxygen Frog, LLC and its CEO, Scott Fleischman (collectively, Oxygen Frog) in the Northern District of Florida for infringement of the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,876,941 and 9,372,488. A jury con- cluded that claims 1 and 7 of both the ’941 and ’488 patents, the only cla ims tried, would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.