Maatuk v. Emerson Electric, Inc., No. 19-1615 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 14, 2019)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
This case involves a business relationship in fluid sen- sor technology that ended in 1999 . Pro se appellant , Dr. Josef Maatuk, appeals two decisions from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio granting summary judgment to Therm-O-Disc. Maatuk v. Emerson Elec. (Maatuk I) , No. 1:16-CV-03023, 2017 WL 9485679 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 14, 2017) (R. & R. adopted by 2018 WL 562934); Maatuk v. Emerson Elec., Inc. (Maatuk II), No. 1:16-CV-03023, 2019 WL 425605 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 4, 2019). Dr.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error