Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., No. 19-1419 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 3, 2020)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1419
Decided
August 3, 2020
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
34 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Illumina, Inc. and Sequenom, Inc. (collectively, “Illu- mina”) appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that claims 1– 2, 4– 5, and 9– 10 of U.S. Patent 9,580,751 (the “’751 pa- tent”) and claims 1 –2 and 10–14 of U.S. Patent 9,738,931 (the “’931 patent”) are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as di- rected to an ineligible natural phenomenon. Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., 356 F. Supp. 3d 925 (N.D. Cal. 2018) (“Decision”).