Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Cardionet, LLC v. InfoBionic, Inc, No. 19-1149 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2020)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1149
Decided
April 17, 2020
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
33 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CardioNet, LLC and Braemar Manufacturing, LLC (collectively, “CardioNet”) appeal the district court’s dis- missal of their patent infringement complaint against In- foBionic, Inc. The district court held that the asserted claims of CardioNet’s U.S. Patent No. 7,941,207 are ineli- gible under 35 U.S.C. § 101, and therefore the complaint failed to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Proce- dure 12(b)(6).