Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational, No. 19-1080 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 19, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Arctic Cat Inc. (“Arctic Cat”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of Florida that Arctic Cat is not entitled to recover pre- complaint damages from Bombardier Recreational Prod- ucts Inc. (“Bombardier”) due to the failure of Arctic Cat’s licensee to mark products in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 287. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Prods. , 334 F. Supp. 3d 1238, 1240 (S.D. Fla. 2018).