Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Amgen Inc. v. Hospira, Inc., No. 19-1067 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 16, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1067
Also Docketed
No. 19-1102 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
December 16, 2019
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Hospira, Inc. ( Hospira) appeals the District of Dela- ware’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL), or alternative motion for new trial, upholding the jury’s verdict that: (1) Amgen, Inc. and Amgen Manufac- turing, Ltd.’s (Amgen) U.S. Patent No. 5,856,298 (the ’298 patent) was infringed and not invalid; (2) fourteen batches of drug substance for Hospira’s erythropoietin biosimilar drug product were not covered by the Safe Harbor provi- sion of 35 U.S.C.