Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Grecia v. Samsung Electronics America, No. 19-1019 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 20, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1019
Decided
August 20, 2019
Judge
Chen, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

William Grecia asserted claims 21, 22, 24, 25, and 27– 30 of U.S. Patent No. 8,533,860 (’860 patent) in a patent infringement suit against Samsung Electronics America, Inc. in Grecia v. Samsung E lectronics America, Inc. , No. 16–cv–9691 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2018). At claim construc- tion, the district court concluded that claim 21 invokes 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6 and is indefinite under § 112, ¶ 2.1 Be- cause claims 22, 24, 25, and 27 –30 depend from claim 21, the district court ruled that those claims were likewise in- definite.