Bombardier Recreational v. Arctic Cat Inc., No. 18-2388 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 20, 2019)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. appeals the dis- trict court’s denial of judgment as a matter of law or a new trial following a jury trial in a patent infringement case . Because substantial evidence supports the jury verdict that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,213,669 are indefinite, and the question of indefiniteness was properly before the jury, we affirm the district court’s denial of Bom- bardier’s post-trial motions regarding the ’669 patent .