Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Neurografix v. Brainlab, Inc., No. 18-2363 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 7, 2019)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2363
Decided
October 7, 2019
Judge
Taranto, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

U.S. Patent No. 5,560,360, which names Dr. Aaron Filler as a co -inventor, describes and claims particular methods of generating images of nerves and other bodily structures by use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology. Dr. Filler and the three appellants named in the caption (collectively, Neuro Grafix) sued the appellees named in the caption (collectively, Brainlab), asserting in- fringement of the ’360 patent.