Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, No. 18-2338 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 20, 2020)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2338
Also Docketed
No. 18-2339, No. 18-2395, No. 18-2396 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
November 20, 2020
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Network-1 Technologies, Inc. (“Network -1”) appeals a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Network-1 sued Hewlett-Pack- ard (“HP”) , alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,218,930 (“the ’930 patent”). HP argued in response that the ’930 patent is invalid , and that HP did not in- fringe. The jury found the patent not infringed and invalid.