Curver Luxembourg, Sarl v. Home Expressions Inc., No. 18-2214 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2019)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
______________________ MICHAEL ANTHONY NICODEMA, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Florham Park, NJ, argued for plaintiff -appellant. Also represented by J ASON HARRIS KISLIN, BARRY SCHINDLER. STEVEN M. AUVIL, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for defendant-appellee. Also repre- sented by JEREMY WILLIAM DUTRA, Washington, DC. ERIK STALLMAN, Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic, University of California, Berkeley School of Law, Berkeley, CA, for amicus curiae Open Source CURVER LUXEMBOURG, SARL v. HOME EXPRESSIONS INC.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error