Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Curver Luxembourg, Sarl v. Home Expressions Inc., No. 18-2214 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2214
Decided
September 12, 2019
Judge
Chen, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

______________________ MICHAEL ANTHONY NICODEMA, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Florham Park, NJ, argued for plaintiff -appellant. Also represented by J ASON HARRIS KISLIN, BARRY SCHINDLER. STEVEN M. AUVIL, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for defendant-appellee. Also repre- sented by JEREMY WILLIAM DUTRA, Washington, DC. ERIK STALLMAN, Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic, University of California, Berkeley School of Law, Berkeley, CA, for amicus curiae Open Source CURVER LUXEMBOURG, SARL v. HOME EXPRESSIONS INC.