Arunachalam v. IBM, No. 18-2105 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 28, 2019)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam, proceeding pro se, appeals multiple decisions from the United States D istrict C ourt for the District of Delaware , including its dismissal of a patent infringement claim, dismissal of civil claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), denial of leave to file a second amended co m- plaint, denials of mo tions for recusal, and various other rulings. For the reasons explained below, we affirm. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY A. Complaint Dr.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error