Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Arunachalam v. IBM, No. 18-2105 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 28, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-2105
Decided
January 28, 2019
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam, proceeding pro se, appeals multiple decisions from the United States D istrict C ourt for the District of Delaware , including its dismissal of a patent infringement claim, dismissal of civil claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), denial of leave to file a second amended co m- plaint, denials of mo tions for recusal, and various other rulings. For the reasons explained below, we affirm. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY A. Complaint Dr.