Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., No. 18-1976 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 5, 2021)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1976
Also Docketed
No. 18-2023 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
August 5, 2021
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
78 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GlaxoSmithKline LLC and SmithKline Beecham (Cork) Ltd. (collectively, GSK) sued Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Dis- trict of Delaware for infringement of claims of GSK’s Reis- sue Patent No. RE40,000. After the jury’s verdict of infringement and its award of damages, the district court granted Teva’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of noninfringement. GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Te va Pharm. USA, Inc., 313 F. Supp. 3d 582 (D. Del. 2018) (Dist. Ct. Op.).