Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Reese v. Sprint Nextel Corporation, No. 18-1971 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1971
Also Docketed
No. 18-1972, No. 18-1973, No. 18-1974, No. 18-1975 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
June 10, 2019
Judge
Reyna, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Morris Reese appeals from a grant of summary judg- ment by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California determining that certain claims of the asserted patent are ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 . The asserted claims are directed to an abstract idea and the claim ele- ments do not transform the nature of the claims into a pa- tent-eligible invention. We affirm. BACKGROUND Morris Reese (“Reese”) owns and is the named inventor of U.S. Patent No. 6,868,150 (“the ’150 patent”).