Aten International Co., Ltd. v. Uniclass Technology Co., Ltd., No. 18-1922 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 6, 2019)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Uniclass Technology Co., Ltd. (“Uniclass”) , as well as Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.; Airlink 101; Phoebe Micro, Inc.; Broadtech International Co., Ltd. , d/b/a Linkskey ; Black Box Corporation ; and Black Box Corporation of Pennsylvania (collectively the “customer defendants”) (all collectively “Appellants”) appeal the United States District Court for the Central District of California’s order denying Appellants’ motion for attorney fees.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error