Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Aten International Co., Ltd. v. Uniclass Technology Co., Ltd., No. 18-1922 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 6, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1922
Decided
August 6, 2019
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Uniclass Technology Co., Ltd. (“Uniclass”) , as well as Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.; Airlink 101; Phoebe Micro, Inc.; Broadtech International Co., Ltd. , d/b/a Linkskey ; Black Box Corporation ; and Black Box Corporation of Pennsylvania (collectively the “customer defendants”) (all collectively “Appellants”) appeal the United States District Court for the Central District of California’s order denying Appellants’ motion for attorney fees.