Fed. Cir.

Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc., No. 18-1817 (Fed. Cir. June 25, 2019)

§ 101 Eligibility Motion to Dismiss Attorneys' Fees

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 18-1817
Also Docketed: No. 18-1819, No. 18-1820, No. 18-1821, No. 18-1822, No. 18-1823, No. 18-1824, No. 18-1825, No. 18-1826, No. 18-2178, No. 18-2179, No. 18-2180, No. 18-2181, No. 18-2183, No. 18-2184 (consolidated; same document)
Decided: June 25, 2019
Judge: O'Malley, J.
Document: Precedential Opinion
Length: 24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Cellspin Soft, Inc. (“Cellspin”) sued Fitbit, Inc. (“Fit- bit”), Moov, Inc. (“Moov”), Nike, Inc. (“Nike”), Fossil Group, Inc. and Misfit, Inc. (“Fossil”), Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin U.S.A., Inc. (“Garmin”), Canon U.S.A., Inc. CELLSPIN SOFT, INC. v. FITBIT, INC. 4 (“Canon”), GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro”), Panasonic Corporation of America (“Panasonic”), and JK Imaging LTD (“JKI”) (col- lectively “Appellees”) for infringing various claims of four different patents.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error