Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

ChargePoint, Inc. v. SemaConnect, Inc., No. 18-1739 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 28, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1739
Decided
March 28, 2019
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Appellant ChargePoint, Inc. appeals the decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, which dis- missed ChargePoint’s complaint und er Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court held that the eight patent claims asserted by ChargePoint were ineligi- ble for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. We affirm. I The technology at issue in this patent infringement case pertains to charging stations for electric vehicles. The battery in an electric vehicle is recharged by connecting the vehicle to an electrical outlet. U.S.