Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Bridge And Post, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc., No. 18-1697 (Fed. Cir. July 5, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1697
Decided
July 5, 2019
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Bridge and Post, Inc. appeals the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which dismissed Bridge and Post’s complaint s under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court held that the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,657,594, 8,862,747, and 9,659,314 were ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Bridge & Post, Inc. v. Verizon Commc’ns, Inc. , 319 F. Supp. 3d 818, 821 (E.D. Va. 2018). For the reasons dis- cussed below, we affirm.