Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Aten International Co., Ltd. v. Uniclass Technology Co., Ltd., No. 18-1606 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 6, 2019)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1606
Decided
August 6, 2019
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ATEN International Co., Ltd. (“ATEN”) appeal s the United States District Court for the Central District of Cal- ifornia’s denial of judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”), which declined to overturn the jury’s findings that the as- serted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,589,141 are invalid as anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and not infringed; and that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,640,289 are not infringed. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse as to invalidity and affirm as to noninfringement. BACKGROUND Uniclass Technology Co., Ltd.