Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Columbia Sportswear v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, No. 18-1329 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2019)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1329
Also Docketed
No. 18-1331, No. 18-1728 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
November 13, 2019
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. (“Colum- bia”) appeals from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California’s judgment after a jury trial that claims 2 and 23 of U.S. Patent 8,453,270 (“the ’270 patent”) are invalid as anticipated and obvious. See Judgment, Co- lumbia Sportswear N. Am. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc., No. 3:17-cv-01781 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2017), ECF No. 403. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. (“Seirus”) cross - appeals from the U.S.