Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Pazandeh v. Yamaha Corporation of America, No. 18-1275 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2018)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1275
Decided
April 6, 2018
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

PAZANDEH v. YAMAHA CORPORATION OF AMERICA 2 Appellant Ira Pazandeh (“Pazandeh”), proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment that two audio speaker models sold by Appellee Yamaha Corporation of America (“Yamaha”) do not infringe claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,577,265 (“the ’265 patent”) literally or under the doctrine of equivalents . He also seeks reversal of the district court’s exceptional case determination. Because we conclude that the district court did not err in its construct ion of the term “respective . . .