Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

DeVona v. Zeitels, No. 18-1210 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1210
Decided
March 18, 2019
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
30 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff-appellant Mr. Dennis DeVona sued Defend- ant-appellee Dr. Steven Zeitels for breach of an alleged partnership agreement and breach of fiduciary duty. At trial, the jury returned a verdict in Mr. DeVona’s favor. Af- ter reviewing the evidence presented at trial, however, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted Dr. Zeitels’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”). The district court determined that no rea- sonable jury could have found that a continuing partner- ship existed after May 1999. Mr. DeVona appeals.