Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Actavis LLC, No. 18-1054 (Fed. Cir. May 3, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1054
Decided
May 3, 2019
Judge
Wallach, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Appellees Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Endo Pharma- ceuticals”) and Mallinckrodt LLC (“Mallinckrodt”) (co llec- tively, “Endo”) sued Appellants Actavis LLC, Actavis South Atlantic LLC, and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (collec- tively, “Actavis”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (“District Court”) , alleging that two Abbrevi- ated New Drug Application s filed by Actavis infringed claims 1–6 (“the Asserted Claims”) of Mallinckrodt’s U.S. Patent No. 8,871,779 (“the ’779 patent”), which Endo Phar- maceuticals licenses.