Taser International, Inc. v. Phazzer Electronics, Inc., No. 17-2637 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 26, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Phazzer Electronics, Inc. (“Phazzer”) appeals from the district court’s order granting Taser International, Inc.’s (“Taser”) motion for sanctions. Taser Int’l, Inc. v. Phazzer Elecs., Inc., No. 6:16 -cv-366, 2017 WL 3584906 (M.D. Fla. July 21, 2017). Specifically, the district court: (1) struck Phazzer’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint; (2) entered default judgment in favor of Taser ; (3) awarded Taser compensatory and treble damages as well as attorney fees and costs; and (4) entered a perm a- nent injunction against Phazzer. Id . at *3.