Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Phigenix, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., No. 17-2617 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 5, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2617
Also Docketed
No. 18-1042 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 5, 2019
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Phigenix, Inc. sued Genentech, Inc. for induc ed in- fringement of various claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,080,534. After striking the infringement opinion of Phigen ix’s ex- pert, the district court granted summary judgment of non- infringement based on a lack of evidence of both direct infringement and intent to induce infringement. The dis- trict court also denied summary judgment of invalidity based on various utility, enablement, and written descrip- tion challenges advanced by Genentech.