Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

United Access Technologies LLC v. AT&T Corp., No. 17-2614 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 24, 2019)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2614
Also Docketed
No. 17-2615, No. 17-2616, No. 18-1030, No. 18-1031, No. 18-1032 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
January 24, 2019
Judge
Bryson, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Appellant United Ac cess Technologies, LLC (“UAT”) brought this patent infringement case against a number of telecommunications companies . UAT accused the defendants of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 5,844,596 (“the ’596 patent”), 6,243,446 (“the ’446 patent”), and 6,542,585 (“the ’585 patent”). In particular, UAT asserted claim 61 of the ’596 patent, claims 1- 5 of the ’446 patent, and claims 1, 2, 4, 8, and 9 of the ’585 patent. 1 The defen d- ants filed a j oint motion for summary judgment of n onin- fringement, which the district court granted.