Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Rehco LLC v. Spin Master, Ltd., No. 17-2589 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 4, 2019)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2589
Decided
February 4, 2019
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff-appellant Rehco, LLC (“Rehco”) sued defen d- ant-appellee Spin Master, Ltd. (“Spin Master”) for breach of contract and infring ement of U.S. Patent No. 7,100,866 (the “’866 patent”). 1 The district court granted summary judgment for Spin Master on both claims. Rehco appeals. We vacate the dist rict court’s summary judgment and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. BACKGROUND I Rehco and Spin Master executed a “Radio -Controlled Helicopter Agreement” in 2001. J.A. 1316–31 (the “Heli- copter Agreement”).