Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Nuvo Pharmaceuticals v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., No. 17-2473 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2019)

Reversed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2473
Also Docketed
No. 17-2481, No. 17-2484, No. 17-2486, No. 17-2489, No. 17-2491, No. 17-2492, No. 17-2493 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
May 15, 2019
Judge
Clevenger, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuti- cals, and Lupin Pharmaceuticals (collectively, “the Gener- ics”) appeal from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey following a bench trial upholding the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,926,907 (“the ’907 patent”) and 8,557,285 (“the ’285 patent”) as nonobvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103, enabled NUVO PHARMACEUTICALS v. DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, and adequately described under § 112. Nuvo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.