Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Capital Security Systems, Inc. v. NCR Corporation, No. 17-2368 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2018)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2368
Decided
March 7, 2018
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Capital Security Systems, I nc. filed a patent i n- fringement action against NCR Corporation and other defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, asserting infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,897,625; 7,653,600; 7,991,696; and 8,121,948. T he district court granted summary judgment of invalidity, holding indefinite the term 1) “ascertains an apparent signature” in claim 1 of the ’600 patent, claim 1 of the ’696 patent, and claims 1 and 2 of the ’948 patent; and 2) “transactional operator” in claim 15 of the ’625 patent .