Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, v. Perrigo Company, No. 17-1950 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 28, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1950
Also Docketed
No. 17-2021, No. 17-2555, No. 18-1243 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
February 28, 2019
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Perrigo Company and L. Perrigo Company (collec- tively, “Perrigo”) appeal from the order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts denying judgment of invalidity as a matter of law of U.S. Patent 5,229,137 (the “’137 patent”) on the basis of anticipation and obvious- ness. Brigham & Women’s Hosp., Inc. v. Perrigo Co. , 280 F. Supp. 3d 192, 205– 06 (D. Mass. 2017) (“ Decision”). Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Inc. and Investors Bio - Tech, L.P.