Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

ZUP, LLC v. Nash Manufacturing, Inc., No. 17-1601 (Fed. Cir. July 25, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1601
Decided
July 25, 2018
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Appellant ZUP, LLC (“ZUP”) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which grant ed summary judgment in favor of Appellee Nash Manufacturing, Inc. (“Nash”). The district court invalidated claims 1 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 8,292,681 (“the ’681 patent”) as obvious and , in the alternative, held that Nash does not infringe c laim 9. We affirm the district court’s holding that claims 1 and 9 are invalid as obvious and do not reach the infringement question.