Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Cap Export, LLC v. Zinus, Inc., No. 17-1540 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2018)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1540
Decided
January 18, 2018
Judge
Bryson, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Zinus, Inc. , appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Cap Export, LLC , and third- party defendants Abraham Amouyal and 4Moda Corp. (collectively, “Cap Export”) by the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The district court ordered Zinus, the owner of U.S. Patent No. 8,9 31,123 (“the ’123 patent”) , to file a motion for summary judgment o f validity of that patent. Following briefing, the court held two of the asserted claims of Zinus’s patent invalid for obviousness.