Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Orexo AB v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC, No. 17-1333 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 10, 2018)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1333
Decided
September 10, 2018
Judge
Newman, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Orexo AB and Orexo US Inc. (collectively “Orexo”) ap- peal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware , holding claims 1, 3–6, and 8– 10 of U.S. Patent No. 8,940,330 (“the ’330 P atent”) invalid on the ground of obviousness.1 The ’330 Patent , entitled “Abuse-Resistant Pharmaceutical Composition for the Treatment of Opioid D ependence,” claims a product having the brand name Zubsolv®, approved by the FDA for treatment of opioid dependence.