Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Ultratec, Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., No. 17-1161 (Fed. Cir. May 18, 2018)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1161
Also Docketed
No. 17-1225 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
May 18, 2018
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiffs Ultratec, Inc. and CapTel , Inc. (collectively, “Ultratec”) appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin’s judgment as a matter of law after a jury verdict that claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,660,398 (“ ’398 patent ”) are invalid as obv i- ous. Ultratec also appeals the district court’s conclusion that d efendants Sorenson Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC (collectively, “Sorenson”) are entitled to judgment as a matter of law that their infringement, if any, was not willful.