Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Coffelt v. Nvidia Corporation, No. 17-1119 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1119
Decided
March 15, 2017
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Louis A. Coffelt, Jr. appeals from the decision of the United Sta tes District Court for the Central District of California, concluding that all claims of U.S. Patent 8,614,710 (“’710 patent”) are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Coffelt v. NVIDIA Corp. , No. 5:16 -cv-00457 (C.D. Cal. June 21, 2016); Appellee’s App. 1–12. Mr. Coffelt owns the asserted patent, which is d i- rected to “a method for deriving a pixel color in a graphic image.” ’7 10 patent , A bstract. The patent recites one independent claim and five dependent claims. Mr.