Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Hospira, Inc., No. 17-1115 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 26, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1115
Decided
October 26, 2017
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (“Merck”) appeals from the decision of the United States Dis trict Court for the District of Delaware concluding, after a bench trial , that claims 21 –34 (“the asserted claims”) of U.S. Patent 6,486,150 (“the ’150 patent”) are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (2006). See Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Hospira Inc., No. C V 14 -915-RGA, 2016 WL 5872620, at *21 (D. Del. July 10, 2016) ( Decision). Because the district court did not err in its conclusion of obviousness, we affirm.