Cave Consulting Group, LLC v. OptumInsight, Inc., No. 17-1060 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 21, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

OptumInsight, Inc. (“Optum”) appeals from the final judgment by the United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California . See Cave Consulting Grp., LLC v. OptumInsight, Inc., No. 5:11 -cv-00469-EJD (N.D. Cal. Apr . 6, 2015), ECF No. 370; J.A. 1. The jud g- ment follows a jury verdict in favor of Cave Consulting Group, LLC (“Cave”) that U.S. Patent 7,739,126 (“the ’126 patent”) is not invalid and was infringed by Optum , awarding Cave $12,325,000 in damages . See Cave Co n- sulting Grp., LLC v. OptumInsight, Inc. , No.