Art+Com Innovationpool GmbH v. Google LLC, No. 17-1016 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 20, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Art+Com Innovationpool GmbH (“Art+Com”) appeals the district court’s entry of j udgment following a jury trial. The jury found that Appellee Google LLC (“Google”) did not infringe claims 1, 3, 14, and 28 (the “asserted claims”) of U.S. Patent No. RE44,550 (“the ’550 patent”) , and that each of the asserted claims is invalid as antici- pated and/or obvious. The district court entered judgment consistent with these verdicts and denied Art+Com’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law , finding that each is supported by substantial evidence.