Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Trustees Of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., No. 16-2576 (Fed. Cir. July 25, 2018)

Reversed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2576
Also Docketed
No. 16-2577, No. 16-2578, No. 16-2579, No. 16-2580, No. 16-2581, No. 16-2582, No. 16-2591, No. 16-2592, No. 16-2593, No. 16-2594, No. 16-2595 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
July 25, 2018
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff-cross-appellant Trustees of Boston Univers i- ty (“BU”) sued defendant s-appellants Everlight Electron- ics Co., Ltd. and Everlight Americas, Inc. (together, “Everlight”); Epistar Corp. (“Epistar”); Lite-On Inc., Lite - On Service USA, Inc., Lite-On Technology Corp., and Lite- On Trading USA, Inc. (together, “Lite -On”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for infringing BU’s U.S. Patent No. 5,686,738 (the “’738 patent”). A jury found that Defend- ants infringed the ’738 patent and failed to prove the patent’s invalidity.