Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Cronos Technologies, LLC v. Expedia, Inc., No. 16-2528 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 17, 2017)

Affirmed
Non-Infringement Claim Construction Summary Judgment Doctrine of Equivalents
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2528
Also Docketed
No. 16-2529, No. 16-2530 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
August 17, 2017
Judge
O'Malley, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Cronos Technologies, LLC (“Cronos”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment that Appellees do not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,664,110 (“the ’110 pa- tent”) either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. See Cronos Techs., LLC v. Expedia, Inc. , Nos. 13 -1538- LPS, 13 -1541-LPS, 13 -1544-LPS, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107479 (D. Del. Aug. 15, 2016); Cronos Techs., LLC v. Expedia, Inc. (Claim Construction), Nos. 13-1538-LPS, 13- 1541-LPS, 13-1544-LPS, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95768, at *23–26 (D. Del. July 22, 2016).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error