Rothschild Connected Devices v. Guardian Protection Services, No. 16-2521 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2017)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Appellant ADS Security, L.P. (“ADS”) appeals the opinion and order of the U.S. District Court for the Eas t- ern District of Texas (“District Court”) denying ADS’s request for attorney fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 (2012). See Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Guardian Prot. Servs., Inc. , No. 2:15 -cv-01431- JRG-RSP, 2016 WL 3883549, at *4 (E.D. Tex. July 18, 2016).
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error