Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Travel Sentry, Inc. v. David Tropp, No. 16-2386 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 19, 2017)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2386
Also Docketed
No. 16-2387, No. 16-2714, No. 17-1025 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
December 19, 2017
Judge
O'Malley, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
30 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This is the third time we have had occasion to preside over this longstanding dispute regarding whether Travel Sentry, Inc. (“Travel Sentry”) and its licensees infringe one or more claims of two patents issued to appellant David A. Tropp (“Tropp”): U.S. Patent Nos. 7,021,537 (“the ’537 patent”) and 7,036,728 ( “the ’728 patent”). See Travel Sentry, Inc. v. Tropp (Travel Sentry II ), 497 F . App’x 958 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Tropp v. Conair Corp. , 484 F. App’x 568 (Fed. Cir. 2012).