Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Exergen Corporation v. Kaz Usa, Inc., No. 16-2315 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2018)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2315
Also Docketed
No. 16-2341 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
March 8, 2018
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
32 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Kaz USA, Inc. (“Kaz”) appeals the United States Di s- trict Court for the District of Massachusetts decision holding claims 7, 14, and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 6,292,685 (“’685 patent”) and claims 17, 24, 33, 39, 40, 46, 49, 60, and 66 of U.S. Patent No. 7,787,938 (“’938 patent”) d i- rected to patent eligible subject matter. Kaz also appeals the district court’s denial of judgment as matter of law on noninfringement of the ’685 patent and denial of a new trial on damages. Exergen Corp.