Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Easyweb Innovations, LLC v. Twitter, Inc., No. 16-2066 (Fed. Cir. May 12, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2066
Decided
May 12, 2017
Judge
Hughes, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

EasyWeb appeals the district court’s grant of su m- mary judgment of patent ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and in the alternative, non- infringement. Because all asserted claims recite patent-ineligible subject matter, we affirm. I EasyWeb sued Twitter for infringement of the follow- ing five patents directed to a message publishing sys tem: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,032,030; 7,596,606; 7,685,247; 7,689,658; and 7,698,372.