Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation, No. 16-1945 (Fed. Cir. July 12, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1945
Also Docketed
No. 16-2050 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
July 12, 2018
Judge
Chen, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

These consolidated appeals arise from a district court action filed by Raytheon Company (Raytheon) against Indigo Systems Corporation and FLIR Systems (FLIR) (collectively, Indigo) for trade secret misappropriation and patent infringement . The pat ent infringement claims were settled by the parties and dismissed. After a three - week trial, a jury found that Indigo did not misappropri- ate Raytheon’s trade secrets relating to the production of infrared cameras . The district court then entered final judgment in favor of Indig o.